April 24, 2006

Republicans urge Bush to probe high gasoline costs

From Reuters via Yahoo! News:

Republican congressional leaders on Monday urged the Bush administration to investigate whether oil companies are overcharging consumers at the gasoline pump and if speculators are pushing up fuel prices.

[...]

Republicans fear they could lose the Senate and House of Representatives in this November's congressional elections if voters retaliate against them for the high fuel prices.

clickehereforallofit

Yep, come election time the Republicans care about the average American all of a sudden. Its too late for them to win back the public, they're majority in Congress is definately going to to dwindle this November. Too bad its New Boss: Same As the Old Boss.

April 23, 2006

I just discovered Bill Maher's "New Rules"

from hbo.com/billmaher/new_rules

And finally, New Rule: People who run everything can't complain that they're underdogs. To whit, this week, there was a highly-attended conference in Washington called "The War on Christians." Because nothing quite says "I'm oppressed," like the opulent Regency Ballroom of the Omni Shoreham Hotel.

Ah, yes, whatever happened to that plucky little cult, Christianity? Oh, that's right, they're 80% of the American people, and have taken over all three branches of government, country music, public schools, the bestseller list, and until recently, Katie Holmes. You know, Christians, I don't mind that you're part of a dress-up cult that hates sex and worships magic but the paranoia, that does scare me.

Did you know that the Missouri legislature recently felt the need to propose a resolution declaring Christianity Missouri's majority religion. No kidding. Really, you mean people aren't saying, "Gosh, I'd like to go to Missouri, but...too Jewish." In Savannah, recently, a children's book about a baby penguin who is raised by two male penguins - ahh! - was removed from the library for its homosexual overtones. Because you know penguins, in those tuxedos, with the dreamy eyes. Huge fags!

The Christian right are now officially the party of paranoia. Secularists are attacking Christmas! Gays are attacking marriage! Liberals are attacking values! White girls are being abducted at an alarming rate! You know, if you're going to be that paranoid all the time, just get high.

And the worst part is, the people bitching loudest about being persecuted for their Christianity aren't Christians at all. They're demagogues and conmen and scolds. And the only thing they worship is power. If you believe Jesus ever had a good word for war or torture or tax cuts for the rich, or raping the earth, or refusing water to dying migrants, then you might as well believe bunnies lay painted eggs.

And Jesus - and Jesus never said a word about gay marriage. He was much too busy hanging out with 12 guys. Now - now I know George Bush says Jesus Christ changed his heart. But believe me, Dick Cheney changed it back. The only thing Bush has in common with Jesus is they both went into their father's business and got crucified for it.

Thomas Jefferson called the type of Christian who trumpets his own belief in the divinity of Jesus rather than the morality of Jesus "pseudo-Christians." And that's who's running our country today. And since they thrive so much on turning water into "whining"—and get off on their endless pretend persecution, this Easter season, let's give them what they want. Let's go to the zoo, get some lions, and feed them Tom DeLay.

######################################

Hilarious stuff. Something that I thought of myself a long time ago, but not in such a funny tone.

Now for a personal experience: about a month ago I was at my church's Sunday youth meeting. Recently re-vamped, our group studies on Wednesdays and either plays or works on Sundays. A bunch of the very few of us wanted to play Halo on the X-Box that they brought. Our youth director asked if the game was "Christian based". "Is Halo Christian based?", is probably one of the funniest questions of 2006, or even 2004 when it was new.

Our director said, "The elders of the church wouldn't approve of us playing a game like that." I couldn't understand why. Because I'm quite positive that the elders of our church are full-blown supporters of the war in Iraq, where our troops (that our God blessed) are shooting people, just like in Halo. Its okay to support real people being shot but not to play a video game where characters get shot. Probably because "our troops is fightin' fer FREEDOM! Them there videos games make young people violent 'n evil!". So the president is second under Jesus for securing our "freedom" by sending young people to go shoot people, but Halo is bad because it makes young people want to go out and.......................shoot people? Something doesn't make sense here. If Jesus is okay with the war, why isn't he okay with violent video games?

This war has much more influence in teaching young people that violence is the answer to your problems than video games where you use weapons that don't even exist. Because what if one of those young person's family members was sent over to fight in Iraq where they'd face the daily danger of being blown into smitherenes, and they automatically had to agree 100% for their loved one to be going there, or else they're being "ungrateful" or "unpatriotic" or "liberal"? Isn't that more emotionally moving to a human than a game?

April 19, 2006

Rove Reliquishes Some Control in Shake-Up

From the AP via Yahoo! News:

White House political mastermind Karl Rove surrendered a key policy role Wednesday and press secretary Scott McClellan resigned in an escalation of a Bush administation shake-up driven by Republican anxieties.

Rove gave up his responsibilities as chief policy coordinator, a position he assumed just over a year ago that strengthened his influence over matters ranging from homeland security and domestic policy to the economy and national security. The promotion had left him stretched too thin in the eyes of some officials, as the White House grappled with mounting problems.

[...]

More changes are expected. White House officials have done nothing to discourage speculation that Treasury Secretary John Snow is leaving. Bush's communications chief, Nicolle Wallace, also is expected to depart because her husband has taken a new job in New York. Changes also are expected in the White House lobbying shop run by Candida Wolff.

The shake-up began with the March 28 resignation of Andy Card, Bush's longtime chief of staff, and his replacement by Bolten. Just this week, Bush has named a new budget chief and a new trade representative and is moving toward choosing a new domestic policy adviser

clickhereforallofit

HAHA! The Republicans are being forced to do what they're worste at, CHANGE. Sure, fresh faces may fool the public for a little while, but the Republicans have been so stubborn with their policies in the past two decades that its unlikely that any of them will be able to come up with successful new ideas to help out this Administration.

They're about to figure out that they're on the wrong side of things that most Americans care about, no matter how they spin it.

April 18, 2006

Bush: 'All Options on the Table' With Iran

From the AP via Yahoo! News:

President Bush said Tuesday that "all options are on the table" to prevent Iran from developing atomic weapons, but said he will continue to focus on the international diplomatic option to persuade Tehran to drop its nuclear ambitions.

"We want to solve this issue diplomatically and we're working hard to do so," Bush told reporters in the Rose Garden.

Bush also said there should be a unified effort involving countries "who recognize the danger of Iran having a nuclear weapon," and he noted that U.S. officials are working closely nations such as Great Britain, France and Germany on the issue."

"We will continue to work diplomatically," he said.

As Bush spoke, diplomats from six countries converged in Moscow to map out the next step toward solving the Iranian nuclear standoff. The United States and Britain say that if Iran does not comply with the U.N. Security Council's April 28 deadline to stop uranium enrichment, they will seek a resolution that would make the demand compulsory but Russia and China remain wary of sanctions.

Bush said he intends to call on Chinese President Hu Jintao to step up pressure on Iran when the two leaders meet Thursday at the White House.

Iran has so far refused to give up uranium enrichment, which the United States and some of its allies suspect is meant to produce weapons. Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Bush was asked if his administration was planning for the possibility of a nuclear strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

"All options are on the table," he said.

But, the president added: "We'll continue to work diplomatically to get this problem solved."

##############################

He's right, all the options are on the table with Iran, but look what they did with Iraq, isn't it obvious which options he's actually considering?

The Right likes to justify the Iraq invasion by the fact that Saddam ignored all THIRTEEN of those U.N. resolutions (isn't it funny how most of the time right wingers seem to hate everything the U.N. says or does, except for their resolutions for Iraq?). Yeah, we had nooooo other option for Iraq. We couldn't carry out a "coo" and have Saddam assassinated, we never do that kind of dirty business. We couldn't lift the sanctions against Iraq that were starving innocent people to death. We couldn't question the intelligence we were given that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, couldn't listen to the other intellegence from that CIA agent who actually investigated those claims, couldn't do any of that stuff.

Why? The "economy" wouldn't profit from it.

The current attention is supposedly the reason why gas prices have shot up so quickly in the past few weeks. What would happen if we took the whole war to Iran? Another $32 billion year for Exxon Mobile and so many dead American troups that they have to reinstate the Draft just to keep the oil and weapons companies happy?

April 17, 2006

Israel Warns of New 'Axis of Terror'

From the AP via Yahoo! News:

Israel warned Monday that a new "axis of terror" — Iran, Syria and the Hamas-run Palestinian government — is sowing the seeds of the first world war of the 21st century. The Palestinians accused Israel of an escalating military campaign using indiscriminate force to kill civilians and entrench its occupation.

The Israeli and Palestinian envoys traded charges at an open Security Council meeting held in response to the recent upsurge in Israeli attacks in Gaza. It took place on a day that a Palestinian suicide bomber struck a packed fast-food restaurant in Tel Aviv, killing nine people in the deadliest bombing in more than a year.

clickhereforallofit

I'm not saying that either side of the Palestine/Israel conflict are right, or justified in attacking one another, but if a bombing resulting in NINE deaths is the DEADLIEST attack in over a year, how can you possibly call that "sowing the seeds" of a world war? Palestine, Iran, and Syria may be dangerous countries (depending on what kind of shit you've done to them in the past century), but they're no more dangerous than Saudi Arabia or the United States or Israel at that. Either Israel or Palestine, it doesn't matter which one, needs to just stop using the same tactics that the other uses against it, no matter what, if they really do want the violence to end. It doesn't even matter who started it, I mean I sure don't know who started all this, its just gone on for much too long, and for what?

Nader Calls Exxon Golden Parachute Unconscionable

From nader.org:

Exxon Mobil reports that it is sending retiring chairman Lee Raymond off with one of the most lavish executive compensation and retirement packages in history – an estimated $398 million in total. This unconscionable windfall cannot be justified by any serious measure of Raymond’s performance, especially since the company’s record-breaking $36 billion annual profits last year had more to do with the Mobil merger, refinery bottlenecks, politically-driven tax breaks and geopolitical events than it did with managerial effectiveness.

The self-dealing that leads to payouts like Raymond’s exposes the failure of corporate boards to protect the interests of shareholders. The conflicts of interest held by compensation consultants and interlocking relationships with other boards of directors make a mockery of any claim to independence. With their rubber-stamp boards, top executives essentially pay themselves, while rendering their shareowners powerless.

The SEC should require that all companies above a certain size put their top executives’ compensation packages up to a proxy vote. If the shareholders believe such pay fails to match performance, they should have a means of signaling the need for restraint. In fact, this reform has been required of British companies since 2002, one reason British CEOs at similarly-sized companies earn little more than half what their American counterparts do.

##############################

I don't have much else to add to this, I just thought it was kinda strange that I didn't notice this mentioned in the Associated Press or anything. What does a retiree need $398 million dollars for? That is outright glutinous, wasteful, and irresponsible. Just one more reason to hate Exxon.